23 Oct Video surveillance of employees did not violate the right to privacy
In the case of López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (applications nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13) the European Court of Human Rights held, by 14 votes to three, that there had...
In the case of López Ribalda and Others v. Spain (applications nos. 1874/13 and 8567/13) the European Court of Human Rights held, by 14 votes to three, that there had...
In the case of Purić and R.B. v. Serbia the European Court of Human Rights (Applications nos. 27929/10 and 52120/13) that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 3 of the European...
In the case of Szurovecz v. Hungary (application no. 15428/16, 08.10.2019.) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 10 (freedom of...
In the case of Lewit v. Austria (application no. 4782/18, 10.10.2019) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 8 (right to...
In the case of L.P. and Carvalho v. Portugal (applications nos. 24845/13 and 49103/15, 08.10.2019) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of...
In the case of Kaak and Others v. Greece (application no. 34215/16, 03.10.19) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been: no violation of Article 3...
In the case of Orlović and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina (application no. 16332/18. 01.10.2019) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of...
In the case of Rizzotto v. Italy (application no. 20983/12, 05.09.2019) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 4...
In the case of Theodorou and Tsotsorou v. Greece (application no. 57854/15, 05.09.2019) the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 12...
In the case of Shala v. Switzerland (application no. 63896/12) the European Court of Human Rights has unanimously declared the application inadmissible, holding that Mr Shala’s complaints were manifestly unfounded. The...